On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 03:16 +0000, richard-harrison(a)comcast.net wrote:
> appreciated if we can hear your comments or suggestions.
From Lyceum's faq:
"The main difference between Lyceum and MU is the database schema. MU
creates a set of tables for each blog in a system. Lyceum uses a fixed
number of tables for the entire system."
IOW, Lyceum does it right, MU does it wrong, from a strictly technical
standpoint.
From a resource/performance perspective, is that wise? How great a
risk is there that "small" and "medium" (fuzzy terms) volume blogs
may
suffer performance hits due to their "much larger" brethren?
Unless the software is coded in a grossly inappropriate manner, little
to none.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com>
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed