Hi Brian,
Thanks for the analysis and info!
For the alt download links - do we want or need to emphasize their availability? Is there
more context for who needs these, how common a need that would be, etc? Bc a better
solution could be - for example - upgrading a particular link from an alt link to a main
download link if new circumstances require it.
~m
On March 21, 2019 4:03:19 PM EDT, Brian Proffitt <bkp(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
Periodically, the Red Hat Open Source and Standards team looks at open
source projects with which we are affiliated to see if there are
community elements that can be improved. Fedora's review late last year
went very well, and after some discussions with Brian Exelbierd, there
were a couple of suggestions we wanted to make to your team to
highlight key areas of Fedora. Specifically:
* Highlight the Alternate Downloads links. Currently on your Downloads
pages, the Get more Fedora links are located on the lower-right corner
of the page. Moving this section up the sidebar would emphasize the
availability of these alternative versions of Fedora.
* Highlight the Project's governance content. The governance model for
Fedora does exist[1], but it is not easy to find. Could a link be added
to the About section in the site's footer?
Those were the only two things we had to suggest. If you have any
questions, please don't hesitate to reach out.
Thanks,
Brian
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/
_______________________________________________
websites mailing list -- websites(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to websites-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/websites@lists.fedoraprojec...
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.