On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:32 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Replying for discussion on the websites list:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This question is asked in the context of
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pertusus/Draft_keeping_infra_open_for...
> which has not already been approved by FESCO, so this could have no
> follow-up, though I think that this issue is also relevant for EPEL.
>
> Till raised an interesting issue associated with adding more releases in
> bodhi: each release takes some place in the left menu. Another could
> still be right, but I think that 4 or more will certainly be
> problematic. Has this issue already been considered? What is the plan
> for EPEL when it switches to using bodhi? In addition to being there
> there will be in the end 3 to 5 EPEL versions in parallel so this is
> certainly an issue that will arise.
>
> Any comment, idea?
Could this not be solved by something AJAXy? Click on the
release you
want to deal with and then (and only then) the submenu appears? Any
browsers/lynx that can handle that, can see the full menu though.
>
> If it ends up that for the proposal (or for EPEL) another bodhi server
> has to be set up, can you tell if it is easy rather easy to set up and
> administer or rather hard?
>
What does the websites team think?
-Mike
--
Nigel Jones <dev(a)nigelj.com>