March 2018 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 28 Blocker Review Meeting

by Adam Williamson

# F28 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-03-05 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have two proposed blockers for Fedora 28 Beta and we're entering the freeze, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow. If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F28 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good day and see you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

6 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?

by Philip Kovacs

I would settle for knowledge of where the f29/rawhide gpg keys are hidden so I import them. The "To Rawhide" instructions below are outdated as they direct you to a page where the f29/rawhideare not presented. Upgrading Fedora using package manager - Fedora Project Wiki | | | Upgrading Fedora using package manager - Fedora Project Wiki | | |

6 years, 1 month

3
5
0 / 0

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

by Farhad Mohammadi Majd

I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay.

6 years, 1 month

2
4
0 / 0

Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

by nicolas.mailhot＠laposte.net

Hi, I am proposing for inclusion a set of rpm technical files aimed at automating the packaging of forge-hosted projects. - Packaging draft: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/734 - go-srpm-macros RFE with the technical files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526721 This proposal is integrated with and depends on the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forge-hosted_projects_packaging_automation draft It builds on the hard work of the Go SIG and reuses the rpm automation of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go when it exists, and produces compatible packages. What it does: - drastically shorter spec files, up to 90% in some cases, often removing hundreds of lines per spec. - simple, packager-friendly spec syntax - automated package naming derived from the native identifier (import path). No more packages names without any relation with current upstream naming. - working Go autoprovides. No forgotten provides anymore. - working Go autorequires. No forgotten requires anymore. - strict automated directory ownership (used by autorequires and autoprovides). - centralized computation of source URLs (via Forge-hosted projects packaging automation). No more packages lacking guidelines. No more broken guidelines no one notices. - easy switch between commits, tags and releases (via Forge-hosted projects packaging automation). No more packages stuck on commits when upstream starts releasing. - guidelines-compliant automated snapshot naming, including snapshot timestamps (via Forge-hosted projects packaging automation). No more packages stuck in 2014. - guidelines-compliant bootstraping. - systematic use of the Go switches defined by the Go maintainer. Easy to do changes followed by a mass rebuild. - flexibility, do the right thing transparently by default, leave room for special cases and overrides. - no bundling (a.k.a. vendoring) due to the pain of packaging one more Go dependency. - centralized Go macros that can be audited and enhanced over time. - aggressive leverage of upstream unit tests to detect quickly broken code. Please consult packaging draft for full information. The proposal has been tested in Rawhide and EL7 over a set of ~ 140 Go packages. This set is a mix of current Fedora packages, bumped to a more recent version, rewrites of Fedora packages, and completely new packages. I hope posting the second part of the automation will answer some questions people had on the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forge-hosted_projects_packaging_automation draft Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

6 years, 1 month

14
63
0 / 0

Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

by Farhad Mohammadi Majd

At few days ago I did open two threads: 1: "Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU" in "Users" https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/fedora-users/threads.html#481765 2. "Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?" in "devel" https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887 I did set "Delivery status" to disabled via web page and used official archiver for viewing emails, but until noon today, it doesn't show new e-mails, I doubt to this situation and searched internet with mentioned titles and found mentioned links, so I noticed official archiver of Fedora is not reliable! Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation you are waiting for e-mails and check the web page several times but you don't see anything! |: It currently shows all new e-mails but not two hours ago.

6 years, 2 months

4
6
0 / 0

Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

by Martin Gansser

Hi, how can i solve this dependencies ? FreeSOLID has broken dependencies in the F-28 tree: On x86_64: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(qhull) On armhfp: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.armv7hl requires pkgconfig(qhull) On ppc64le: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.ppc64le requires pkgconfig(qhull) On aarch64: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.aarch64 requires pkgconfig(qhull) On ppc64: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.ppc64 requires pkgconfig(qhull) On s390x: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.s390x requires pkgconfig(qhull) On i386: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.i686 requires pkgconfig(qhull) Please resolve this as soon as possible.

6 years, 2 months

5
9
0 / 0

Meeting March 5 (Monday)

by Silvia Sánchez

Hello folks, I'm out of luck in the last times... I just realised I'm likely to be offline at 16:00 this Monday as I'll be flying in the afternoon. So maybe I can attend later, or maybe not. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. The storm has thrown everything into chaos. Kind regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Orphaning procedure for rubygem-review

by Antonio Trande

Hi all. This mail is part of the "orphaning" procedure for 'rubygem-review' package [1]. Feel free to adopt it if interested. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-review -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

qarte - compilation fails

by Martin Gansser

Hi, when compiling qarte-4.4.0 with this spec file https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/test/qarte.spec '[' noarch = noarch ']' + case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1 Compiling /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qarte-4.0.0-1.fc27.x86_64/usr/share/qarte/arteconcert.py ... File "/usr/share/qarte/arteconcert.py", line 385 def update_pitch(self, *args, html=False): ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rp9wQD (%install) only when i comment the following line, the program compiles fine: #####cp -p *.py* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}

6 years, 2 months

4
4
0 / 0

Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

by Farhad Mohammadi Majd

I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay.

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel March 2018