Re: ocaml-lablgl problems · Re: rawhide report: 20070904 changes
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:50:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:27:05 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:00:15 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=146743&name=root.log
>>>>> Have you rebuilt ocaml-lablgl for the new version-release of ocaml
>>>>> yet? It still requires the older ocaml = 3.10.0-4.fc8 as you can
see
>>>>> here, too
>>>> I can't build ocaml-lablgl because I'm not the package owner
(AIUI).
>>>>
>>>> I don't _want_ ocaml-labgl in order to build ocaml-findlib -
it's not
>>>> needed for that build.
>>> Okay, then let's see whether the failure is reproducible with
>>> a scratch-build of ocaml-findlib:
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=146938
>>>
>>> ocaml-lablgl is not listed anywhere in the koji buildroot log and not
during
>>> the resolve-step either.
>> So ... it's a bug in Koji then?
>
> To me it smells like conflicting Provides.
> Take a look at what symbols ocaml-lablgl provides:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=191299
OK, the provides in that package are totally wrong.
Someone else built that package? (I admit I don't really understand the
complex system of branches used by Fedora). In fedora-development repo
I see the correct list of provides for that package:
rjones@oirase:~$ repoquery --provides ocaml-lablgl
ocaml(Gl) = cd8e921dfaef68b9f7fdf19f19093d5e
ocaml(GlArray) = 12a887a1d8b0554c82b2b7ec6ab8b9c6
ocaml(GlClear) = 8bb155ee2a37256be58e2a0157b8bafe
ocaml(GlDraw) = 06a8bccb576f39b6fc4dd55c04423355
[etc.]
(ie. no ocaml(Arg), etc. which are provided by the base ocaml-runtime
package).
What you call "fedora-development repo" is the frozen repo, whereas
in koji there is a newer build of ocaml-lablgl:
ocaml-lablgl = 1.02-12.fc8 (fedora-development)
vs.
ocaml-lablgl = 1.02-13.fc8 (koji)
Apparently, the latter build (after the freeze!) is broken and provides
more stuff.
So what can I do to fix this? Temporarily add Conflicts? Can I tell
yum to definitely choose one package over another?
Open a ticket?