On 30 January 2013 04:24, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Second, if mariadb differs more in the future and stops to be
"drop-in"
replacement, then we'll need an alternative for applications, where mariadb
won't be suitable enough. Nevertheless, this is not a current issue right
now.
>
Indeed this is a straw man effectively.
Is it?
http://blog.mariadb.org/explanation-on-mariadb-10-0/ and
http://blog.mariadb.org/mariadb-10-0-and-mysql-5-6/ seem to suggest that
MariaDB will no longer be following Mysql as religiously as the feature
suggests