On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Gregory Maxwell<gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What would be the point of packaging something which can not operate
without codecs that fedora can not and should not ship?
That was the rationale for vagalume ending up in rpmfusion-free: the
code itself is fully free, but it's not usable without some
patent-encumbered codecs.
By that rationale, though, shouldn't totem-youtube end up in rpmfusion-free too?
Regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim