26.11.2013 20:00, puntogil(a)libero.it пишет:
Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
> 26.11.2013 15:06, puntogil(a)libero.it wrote:
>> Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
>>> 25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>>>> W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
>>>>> How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired
soon?
>>>> No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with
>>>> Ant or Gradle. Fedora uses the first option.)
>>>>
>>> Thanks, Mikolaj.
>>> But IIRC groovy >= 2.0 switched to gradle build only?
>> yes
>>> Have not you
>>> either plans to update it?
>>>
>> dont forget this problem
>> groovy-all 1.8.x asm3
>> groovy-all 2.x asm4
>> gradle use groovy-all 1.8.x ( with asm3) and asm4
>>
> Then we have circle?
yes
> That problem what you discussing before (pointed in
> mail list previously)?
yes, but if you do the same type of question the answer is always the same
> So, no chance update both without exception use
> binary bundled version or fully maintain alternative build system
> (bootstrap)?
what would change? ... own nothing ...
gradle, use at runtime those libraries, and don't work with our ...
Ok, sorry for the stupid questions. May be it because I can't believe in it.
One more question. Did you see how other distributions handle it?
Debian have groovy 2.1.0 (
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/groovy ) and gradle 1.4 (
http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=gradle )