On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 09:39, Patrick Creech <pcreech(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 07:56 +0100, Miro HronĨok wrote:
> On 12. 11. 18 22:37, Patrick Creech wrote:
> > The pulp team is orphaning the pulp 2 stack in fedora's repositories.
> >
> > The upstream project is focusing the majority of it's development efforts
on pulp 3, and is removing fedora support for the pulp 2 line.
> >
> > This will also assist other package's transitions to python 3 only, as
there have been cases where pulp prevented them from dropping python 2 in fedora.
>
> If you orphan it, but not retire it, it won't help much.
Ah, I was under the (possibly incorrect?) assumption that orphaning was the beginning
step in retiring?
The resources I saw really only said that to retire it had to be orphaned, or at least
that's what I gleaned from those articles.
Thoughts on how to proceed, since a good portion are already 'orphaned', and the
rest are waiting on action from the other 'owner'
It is usually correct when you have software which can be kept up by
someone else. If the code is dead and to be replaced by another.. then
retiring is correct.
> > Packages being orphaned:
> > - pulp
> > - pulp-rpm
> > - pulp-puppet
> > - pulp-ostree
> > - pulp-docker
> > - pulp-python
> > - python-crane
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Stephen J Smoogen.