El jue, 10 dic 2020 a las 9:52, Josh Boyer (<jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org>) escribió:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:55 AM Sergio Belkin <sebelk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > El mié, 9 dic 2020 a las 9:28, Peter Robinson (<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>)
escribió:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:12 AM Christoph Karl <pampelmuse(a)gmx.at>
wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello!
> >> >
> >> > On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >> > > How does this
(
https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
> >> > > affect Fedora?
> >> >
> >> > I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
> >>
> >> Why? What would it provide that CentOS Stream doesn't?
> >>
> >> > At least I was planning to support CentOS via EPEL as
> >> > a kind of "Fedora LTS".
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards
> >> > Christoph
> >
> >
> > Cutting-edge features?
>
> That's actually really hard. Every cutting-edge feature one person
> wants is superfluous and risky to a different person. If you want an
> update of foo to the latest version, it's likely to break someone else
> that was perfectly happy with the current version. There's a reason
> why CentOS, RHEL, and even Ubuntu LTS aren't really targeted at
> cutting edge feature work. A Fedora LTS would run into all the same
> problems.
>
> That being said, there *are* opportunities to provide that on CentOS
> Stream (or RHEL). We have EPEL, we have modularity, etc. If the OS
> itself isn't providing the features you need, we have projects that
> can fill those gaps while leaving the OS itself at the solid, stable
> base it needs to be. One thing I'm excited to see is CentOS Stream
> SIGs that take Stream and build out features in a more comprehensive
> (or even invasive) way to meet some of those use cases.
>
> josh
I think in features like btrfs or zram...
Yep, and a CentOS Stream SIG around those would be really neat to see!
josh