Re: Changing docs.stg.fp.o and docs.fp.o

[Justin W. Flory]

On 10/26/2017 08:56 AM, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, at 02:52 PM, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> > Hi team,
> > I was talking with Matthew Miller and we believe that we should change
> > the way our publishing process stages.  Specifically, we should
> > have the
> > new CI job that does publishing push updates to both docs.stg.fp.o and
> > docs.fp.o at the same time.
> >
> >
> > This sounds good!
> > Fedora infrastructure republishes docs.stg.fp.o approximately every 5
> > minutes and they republish docs.fp.o once per hour.  By pushing to
> > both
> > we are creating a situation where accepted changes go live faster.  In
> > general we have time to catch any staging errors with a new
> > publish, and
> > in the case where we miss it, the site is republished an hour later
> > anyway.
> >
> > Wow, that's fast! If we can push this hourly to prod, we will be doing
> > great!
>
> Infrastructure implemented this for us a couple of months ago.  We can
> do this today, we just have a manual build process.  docs.stg.fp.o is
> updated with a new design and will probably go live to docs.fp.o soon.
>
> Take a look at provide some feedback :)

I am +1. Anywhere we can automate where it makes sense sounds logical to
me. I would imagine some amount of mistakes are probably fixed shortly
after publication anyways, which fits this model.