Topics we should have docs for
I'm looking at incoming searches for fedoraproject.org (landing in the
wiki). The most commmon term is (by far) "epel" — we should make sure
we have good EPEL docs. But, filtering that out, and also removing
Fedora, the top twenty terms are:
1. dnf
2. virtio drivers
3. firewalld
4. nmcli
5. virtio
6. systemctl list services
7. grub2-mkconfig
8. edit iptables
9. sssd
10. dnf update
11. iptables add rule
12. anaconda linux
13. dnf upgrade
14. iptables config file
15. iptables config
16. virtio-win
17. aarch64
18. dnf system upgrade
19. gssproxy
20. dracut
I know that this is self-reinforcing, since we get clicks for things
where we already have enticing wiki docs, but, still, this seems like a
starting place for things we should have covered in the new docs
system.
Alsqo, the above is by clicks. Here is the list by impressions — times
we were shown in results regardless of whether someone clicked —
followed by click-through ratio. Where this is low, we should have
*better* docs. Also I left "epel" in here but filtered out "fedora".
1. anaconda (0.21%) although here we fairly might not be what was wanted
2. dnf (3%)
3. yum (0.78%)
4. selinux (0.54%) this we should do better on!
5. epel (46.72%)
6. systemd (0.41%)
7. koji (0.57%)
8. sssd (2.36%)
9. rhel (0.1%) hmmm.
10. wayland (0.25%)
11. gpg (0.29%)
12. firewalld (12.04%)
13. systemctl list services (8.17%)
14. dracut (3.88%)
15. copr (0.41%)
16. fedup (1.08%)
17. systemctl (0.46%)
18. gpg key (1.5%)
19. aarch64 (5.49%) this is pretty great really!
20. virtio (12.55%) ditto
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader