On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:50 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 20:17 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I believe some changes are in order for the fedora-doc-common package.
> Rather than having this package "roll" forever with a
"cvsYYYYMMDD"
> designator, I think it will be preferable, both for us and Fedora
> Extras, to simply version/release tag the specfile, per normal, and "cvs
> tag" the docs-common module with that version/release combo. If you
> want to see the current state of the file, look at this URL:
>
>
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/docs-common/packaging/fedora-doc-com...
That gen'd a 400 error for me.
Only because I em stoopid. Honestly, would you think it was so hard to
use copy+paste? :-( In my defense, 95% of the time I do it, I just
save the typos for the 5% of my work that goes out into the googlemind.
*sigh*
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/docs-common/packaging/fedora-doc-com...
Regardless, what you propose to me sounds sane and the Right Thing
To
Do.
Hopefully Ignacio agrees. He is buried in some other work right now but
I know he will get to this when he has a chance.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/