-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 01:34:26PM -0500, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:00:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> At the last meeting, we seemed to come to an agreement on the
> procedure. I've captured the refinements we discussed[0], Please point
> out any glaring flawsyou see. Let's use this procedure for the F17
> cycle and then we can see where we need to improve the process.
>
> [0]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_QA_Procedure
Not sure if this has happened yet or not but should I/someone change *all* BZ components
to use Docs-QA for the default QA contact? What about existing tickets? I can do this
without too much trouble if needed.
And it appears that I answered my own question by looking at the last meeting minutes.
Working on fixing BZ now. Still need an answer on existing tickets, though.
- -- Eric
- --------------------------------------------------
Eric H Christensen eric(a)christensenplace.us
"Sparks" sparks(a)fedoraproject.org
.... .. .-.. .-.. --- .-- --- .-. .-.. -..
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
- --------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO/1k7AAoJEIB2q94CS7PRIRAQAN5CbRgH9IovxhVhSdGYwkZQ
TJSZBJ2nQsawrhbZL4hetcJ+5X29OX2JcUv9Bko0hA/7HbJyOl3dvo09ELa63Nns
33dv7cFWIiGO6fL/n2N+iJ84xC8ekagj+xsxe0quE6MHUwfoczoKk1UMQONws4qL
fz/4uknODx2ShFxenmCMKYa3pHAbWw0mgnIxzVhrbMuCHgweNf1tXwHdI7T/F1ng
DUg9pS9Tydkr49ldofDHlv/uE5P7r3EtUGFJKUv9zOaLMCqRSAgbHfeCzWbAvk9P
dVgSpe62SnWI6YS5PvJFb/kBf34NaNWdsSufuYwn+rJb9Gx0zt8+uPbOeDkpitTM
WwEiw09+GIfIqKr8MsrHA6zAuyCWg9akOQ5ROwEvtE08wDwC/0dSwcJKJpjW3z4t
fnMRQC7kQrwwCinnZiCQhtw89La2/a3OQTbSROpm83WimAs68zBHIBC5L4TIp4em
Op73O7rSC6Qu6w093PdGDttwWYi8thAmRq99WnuIsPwO3ClGAHe0D304oFAZBYQR
5ux5ypdKCEDIp08DTMNvufZXA+2XaSHe1def7/ss/ACnZIAb5t7hbqpr2VbRgexP
mkG15tr0Aj02YFAs3riOPaCRZIVKgVp9OxE91LFviKCfWkj+nBc/3xEBdSiSytYQ
o+7vp95qAZjeaIyO+WBk
=B8Z0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----