On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:26 -0800, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:48 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Hello, All!
>
> Currently, the RPM packaging is geared to produce two types of RPM:
>
> 1) A .src.rpm whose content is somewhat similar to a CVS checkout; and
>
> 2) A .noarch.rpm whose content is targeted to the GNOME/KDE help
> infrastructure.
>
> Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or
> should we have an additional version?
What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files?
Local URIs to use via file:/// in Firefox. Maybe linked from the
relnotes.
I'd like to see there be a sort of envar $FEDORA_NEAREST_DOCS_URI that
can be set for a user so that Firefox goes to this URI for
documentation. That lets people get content locally when offline or
behind a restrictive firewall.
Or am I just weird?
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer *
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Content Services Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject