Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Karsten Wade
<kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Our current system is essentially checking rendered content in to
> source control, and an auto-builder puts it on the web. Historically,
> this system was never well adopted, even by people who otherwise know
> and understand the tools. Instead, easier to use tools have drawn the
> attention and content, such as wikis and blogs. The adoption rates
> are staggering by comparison.
I am sure that I have missed this somewhere, but what are the specific
pain points that make the source_control_toolchain_builder driven
system not adoption ready ?
Not enough time in a day to waste on learning something like this. I
have been a active contributor via release notes but only on wiki edits.
Someone else has been doing the conversion into docbook xml and
publishing it.
Not that I don't know docbook xml or aren't aware of the benefits but it
is simply too tedious to do on a regular basis. a CMS would cut the
middlemen and let me publish directly, hopefully.
Rahul