Not implying folks should wait. Please start without me. On Dec 17, 2013 7:40 AM, "David Timothy Strauss" david@davidstrauss.net wrote:
I'll be joining in a bit late today. On Dec 17, 2013 7:25 AM, "Stephen Gallagher" sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I think we have four topics that we should discuss today before the winter holidays separate us.
Just a reminder that the PRD needs to specify only our high-level goals and not define an implementation for them. It is acceptable (for example) to state that a use-case is "There must be a graphical configuration API for networking" without specifying a technology (e.g. NetworkManager) or a display mechanism (e.g. Wayland or Web UI). We merely need to identify what we want to accomplish, not how we will do it. That comes after the PRD approval and will require that we approach upstreams directly and ask for input and help. Something like a vendor analysis.
#topic Final Assessment of Personas
#topic PRD: Delivery Plan
#topic PRD: Use Cases
#topic PRD: Server Role Requirements -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlKwbR8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6M/3QCdFbHF8pXmXZhZM4lxc5PeFA8U m4UAnREges9oR6bROj+hMn02HIlbJu7b =e1Ca -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server