On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:55:34 -0500 Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
What we need right now is a vote of the Server Working Group membership whether we feel this document is in sufficiently good shape to send to FESCo, who intends to use it to gauge estimates for the Fedora 21 schedule. Please cast your votes as soon as possible (I realize this may mean giving up an hour of your weekend to read the document). If you have serious concerns, please raise them immediately.
In general I am +1 to sending to fesco. ;)
Some minor nits:
* I think we should drop the note about armv8... it not only needs hardware available, but promotion from secondary arch, etc. I'd love to support it, but I don't think we should try and do so before it's been fully brought up.
* I don't know that there are any tech limitations for /boot not on lvm. But there's still an important case that needs it: encrypted /
* Did we want to list the media? ie, a network install iso and a non network install iso and sizes?
Looks great otherwise, although I am sure we need to flesh it out some and add things we havent thought of yet. ;)
Thanks for writing things up!
kevin