On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 11:08 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:00:36 -0800
Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I like this idea. And right now I have mariadb running on a bunch of
> separate systems, which kinda sucks, so I could certainly dogfood it.
Ditto here, although I prefer postgres. ;)
+1 for postgres :-)
(and now you probably guess which is the db I hate due to data
losses :-)
There's a lot of value add we could put on top of a database role
that
lots of people have to do themselves. Things like regular dumps of data
for backups, etc.
Yes, I think it is fundamental for a role like this to enable backups,
if not by default as a very simple role configuration operation.
I do this for my postgres sql database and every time I need to redo it
I have forgotten everything and have to go back to learn how to
correctly run the dump command to get all the needed data.
ATM I also play with storing the dumps in git, for easy rollback :-P
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York