Am 31.10.2021 um 16:03 schrieb Ahmed Almeleh
<aalmeleh.whatever.0101(a)gmail.com>:
mostly through written tickets on bugzilla and fedora blocker bugs. Then we QA test
different bugs to see if we get the same results.
there were none regarding server, as far as I know.
Let's wait and see what other members come up with.
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 at 14:35, Peter Boy <pboy(a)uni-bremen.de>
wrote:
Dear Ahmed
> Am 31.10.2021 um 13:39 schrieb Ahmed Almeleh
<aalmeleh.whatever.0101(a)gmail.com>:
>
> I didn't yet test the server variant of the x86_64 architecture of Fedora 35 RC
1.2 manually; however I have tested some of the base images for Fedora workstation 35 RC
1.1 for the MATE spin. All of which passed. Also I tested the "Everything
netinst" for Fedora Workstation 35 RC 1.2 that passed as well. Majority of the tests
are ran by Coconut, one of the bots. Mostly through openQA. If required I can test the
server server variant of the x86_64 architecture of Fedora 35 RC 1.2 manually. I do think
that manual testing is better as bots are able to sometimes become faulty.
many many thanks for your offering. I'm afraid it's too late now for testing the
installation. F35 is go and Tuesday is release time. Now one can only hope. But it would
be very helpful if we could count on your help for rawhide / F36.
I really don’t know what is best to do. I’m wondering (and worrying) how these issues
came about. In fact, I don't even know what is tested per bot in detail. With
workstations, there are likely to be hardware and driver peculiarities (different graphics
adapters, proprietary wifi, etc.). With headless servers, many things do not even arise.
How does the workstation WG organize all of that?
Thanks
Peter