On 09/23/2016 09:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
OK, so is what we have on Kolinahr right now
* Enough work for one year?
* Too much work for one year?
Followed by:
* Who is going to work on which pieces?
* Who is going to write the new PRD?
Also, while this covers the end-user features we want to support, it doesn't
necessarily cover any changes we want to make to the OS itself.
I'd like to suggest the following to the Outcomes:
"Users of Fedora Server Edition have a very limited attack surface in the
default installation".
Which would come from the following outputs:
* Minimal viable install set content
* Highly-restrictive firewall defaults
And activities:
* Define a minimal package set for install media
* Research the optimum firewall state
Beyond that, we also probably want to have another Outcome:
"Users of Fedora Server Edition have a reliable update mechanism"
Outputs:
* ostree-based installation type
Activities
* Create ostree repository for Server Edition
* Establish hosting for ostree repository
Another Outcome:
"Users of Fedora Server Edition can install it on most hardware and popular
cloud providers"
Outputs:
* Install media for hardware - traditional
* Install media for hardware - ostree
* AMI image (Consider only one or the other for this...)
* OpenStack-compatible image
Yet another:
"Users can deploy Fedora Server automatically"
Outputs:
* Deployment Role (built atop PXE, DHCP, tftp; maybe cobbler)
Hit me with some more ideas! I'll add these to the Kolinahr page for now; we can
do prioritization later.
Added, screenshot attached for posterity. I didn't add any of the fun colors in
the interest of expediency, so feel free to log in and fix that!