Suddenly I can't print the Sunday crossword puzzles! Firefox prints the pdf files via evince and something has gone wrong there. I have two Brother laser printers, an HL-5124 and an HL-2170W, printing to either one from Evince causes the "Paper" light to come on although they have plenty of paper in them. The printing process runs right up to the point where the paper should be picked up and stops with the error light flashing, same on both printers, I didn't try the HP ink jet but there's little doubt it would have been the same.
The work around is to tell Firefox to print pdf's through xpdf which I also have. But I would like to fix the evince problem. I am not certain if this began as a result of yum updates done 9/22 per the log, but I see a couple of CUPS updates listed? I didn't see any printer configuration items in the evince menus ...
Any thoughts, suggestions welcome.
Bob
Bob Goodwin ha scritto / said the following il giorno/on 25/09/2011 19:42:
Suddenly I can't print the Sunday crossword puzzles! Firefox prints the pdf files via evince and something has gone wrong there. I have two Brother laser printers, an HL-5124 and an HL-2170W, printing to either one from Evince causes the "Paper" light to come on although they have plenty of paper in them. The printing process runs right up to the point where the paper should be picked up and stops with the error light flashing, same on both printers, I didn't try the HP ink jet but there's little doubt it would have been the same. The work around is to tell Firefox to print pdf's through xpdf which I also have. But I would like to fix the evince problem. I am not certain if this began as a result of yum updates done 9/22 per the log, but I see a couple of CUPS updates listed? I didn't see any printer configuration items in the evince menus ... Any thoughts, suggestions welcome. Bob
did you try to change resolution?? I had a similar problem with my Samsung laser printer
On 09/25/2011 08:03 PM, antonio montagnani wrote: <>
when posting to tech support;
}> To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
}> Cc: Fedora List fedora-list@redhat.com
please use one or other address, not both.
proper address is;
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
thank you.
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 06:45 +0000, g wrote:
when posting to tech support;
}> To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
}> Cc: Fedora List fedora-list@redhat.com
please use one or other address, not both.
proper address is;
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Actually, the fedora-list@redhat.com is supposed to be defunct, now. So no-one should post anything to it. And it just fobs the message back to here, but thanks to the method, duplicate posts appear.
Don't just pick one out of the two, *only* post to users@lists.fedoraproject.org.
2011/9/26 Tim ignored_mailbox@yahoo.com.au:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 06:45 +0000, g wrote:
when posting to tech support;
}> To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
}> Cc: Fedora List fedora-list@redhat.com
please use one or other address, not both.
proper address is;
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Actually, the fedora-list@redhat.com is supposed to be defunct, now. So no-one should post anything to it. And it just fobs the message back to here, but thanks to the method, duplicate posts appear.
Don't just pick one out of the two, *only* post to users@lists.fedoraproject.org.
-- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
just because I pushed a Reply to all and not a simple Reply... :-(
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:28 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
just because I pushed a Reply to all and not a simple Reply... :-(
Well the "post to this list, only" message is more about the original poster than the respondent. But it does highlight yet another problem with the "reply to all" feature not always doing what you expect.
With any list mail, I keep an eye on the "to" and "cc" fields, when replying. Sometimes you get surprises, some of which can be to aid spam harvesters. And with news groups, you get some people subverting conversations by sticking in another newsgroup in the "follow up to" header.