users February 2012

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

237 participants
273 discussions

Alsa-utils update broken
by Heinz Diehl 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

Hi, seems like alsa-lib update is broken, does anybody see the same with F16? Guess there isn't any alsa-lib package >= 1.0.25 in F16 updates. [root@wildsau ~]# yum update Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package alsa-utils.x86_64 0:1.0.24.1-5.fc16 will be updated ---> Package alsa-utils.x86_64 0:1.0.25-7.fc16 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: alsa-lib >= 1.0.25 for package: alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16.x86_64 (updates) Requires: alsa-lib >= 1.0.25 Installed: alsa-lib-1.0.24-2.fc15.i686 (@fedora/15) alsa-lib = 1.0.24-2.fc15 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

10 30

help: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/accounts-daemon....
by SES 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

What's up with these errors...they are persistant? see below... Thanks for your patience...I love Fedora! SES SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/accounts-daemon from read access on the file cpuinfo. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests *************************** If you believe that accounts-daemon should be allowed read access on the cpuinfo file by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # grep accounts-daemon /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol # semodule -i mypol.pp Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 Target Context system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 Target Objects cpuinfo [ file ] Source accounts-daemon Source Path /usr/libexec/accounts-daemon Port <Unknown> Host andix Source RPM Packages accountsservice-0.6.14-2.fc16 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.10.0-46.fc16 Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Host Name andix Platform Linux andix 3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 26 03:21:58 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 1 First Seen Sat 04 Feb 2012 02:21:51 PM EST Last Seen Sat 04 Feb 2012 02:21:51 PM EST Local ID 23013443-3786-4251-aae1-305975161bb2 Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1328383311.327:49): avc: denied { read } for pid=1086 comm="accounts-daemon" name="cpuinfo" dev=proc ino=4026532023 scontext=system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 tclass=file type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1328383311.327:49): arch=x86_64 syscall=open success=no exit=EACCES a0=30daf72a53 a1=80000 a2=d a3=1 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1086 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=accounts-daemon exe=/usr/libexec/accounts-daemon subj=system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 key=(null) Hash: accounts-daemon,accountsd_t,proc_t,file,read audit2allow #============= accountsd_t ============== allow accountsd_t proc_t:file read; audit2allow -R #============= accountsd_t ============== allow accountsd_t proc_t:file read; SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/accounts-daemon from read access on the file cpuinfo. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests *************************** If you believe that accounts-daemon should be allowed read access on the cpuinfo file by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # grep accounts-daemon /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol # semodule -i mypol.pp Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 Target Context system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 Target Objects cpuinfo [ file ] Source accounts-daemon Source Path /usr/libexec/accounts-daemon Port <Unknown> Host andix Source RPM Packages accountsservice-0.6.14-2.fc16 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.10.0-46.fc16 Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Host Name andix Platform Linux andix 3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 26 03:21:58 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 1 First Seen Sat 04 Feb 2012 02:21:51 PM EST Last Seen Sat 04 Feb 2012 02:21:51 PM EST Local ID 23013443-3786-4251-aae1-305975161bb2 Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1328383311.327:49): avc: denied { read } for pid=1086 comm="accounts-daemon" name="cpuinfo" dev=proc ino=4026532023 scontext=system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 tclass=file type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1328383311.327:49): arch=x86_64 syscall=open success=no exit=EACCES a0=30daf72a53 a1=80000 a2=d a3=1 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1086 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=accounts-daemon exe=/usr/libexec/accounts-daemon subj=system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 key=(null) Hash: accounts-daemon,accountsd_t,proc_t,file,read audit2allow #============= accountsd_t ============== allow accountsd_t proc_t:file read; audit2allow -R #============= accountsd_t ============== allow accountsd_t proc_t:file read;

2 1

rm no dir?
by Frank Murphy 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

Sample dir for testing purposes. In the following how can this be done, so the symlink is kept. ls -l /nfs/yum/x86_64/16/_local/ -rw-rw----+ 1 root root 4939e67271963d8214859447421aa2d5d76132703a68fec172e365d465324e53-primary.sqlite lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root packages -> /nfs/yum/i386/16/_local/packages -rw-rw----+ 1 root root repomd.xml echo rm /nfs/yum/x86_64/16/_local/* rm /nfs/yum/x86_64/16/_local/4939e67271963d8214859447421aa2d5d76132703a68fec172e365d465324e53-primary.sqlite /nfs/yum/x86_64/16/_local/packages /nfs/yum/x86_64/16/_local/repomd.xml man rm doesn't give anything on keeping symlinks. I would like to have the job eventually to run as a cron. -- Regards Frank "Jack of all Fubars"

3 4

split pdf file into two
by Ranjan Maitra 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

Dear friends, Does anyone know how to do this on F16? Sorry for the terseness of the question. Ranjan

9 10

Re: iptables? issue
by nullv＠gmx.com 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

I was reading this thread and when I hit nullv's message the coin dropped about routers if he wants to use one of his Internet addresses as a gateway for the internal network. If he wants access to his 10.x.y.z network, though, that db0 machine will have to come in through one of his computers using port forwarding, not necessarily NAT. And if he wants db0 to be exposed on the Internet he'd have to play the aliasing tricks. It's not clear to me just what he was trying to do. Using one of his machines as a router/gateway/firewall makes a lot of sense from a security standpoint. For the 10.x.y.z he'd want to use NAT, though. That would hide the db0 machine from the Internet quite nicely while other machines showed cleanly. {^_^} -- I've been trying out the SNAT-ing the ips through one-to-one rules such as: -A POSTROUTING -i eth0 -o eth1 -s 10.0.0.2/32 -j SNAT --to-source 41.123.234.56/32 but i doesn't seem to work as expected. If i MASQUERADE the wan ip evertything seems to work but for SNAT i can't seem to get a direct from inside my lan to the outside. I'm missing something again?

2 1

lv_home can't be mount at boot time
by 嘉谟 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

I met a problem when fedora booting. can't mount /home ! And In Emergency mode the lv_home which was automaticly build when i installed fedora was disappear in /dev/vg_yxy ,while /dev/vg_yxy/lv_root was there and mount correctly. lvdisplay show lv_home is not available . Hereis what i do to mount /home 1 lvchange -a y /dev/vg_yxy/lv_home 2 I found /dev/vg_yxy/lv_root ---> ../dm-1 and there is /dev/dm-2 so ln -s /dev/dm-2 /dev/vg_yxy/lv_home 3 mount /home yes it can be mounted . and the file is all ok. there is two problem. 1 I can't ,move mouse and keyboard can't responsed 2 reboot . /home was mounted again .I should do the same thing! I google it .found can write /etc/inittabe to do before lvm was mounted. however fedora16 didn't use /etc/inittable So What can i do now ? I'm not in linux so can't get the message from it.

1 0

Re: BOINC x86_64 - anyone had this working recently?
by Philip Rhoades 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

Germán, > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:00:25 -0200 > From: "Germán A. Racca" <german.racca(a)gmail.com> > To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: BOINC x86_64 - anyone had this working recently? > Message-ID: <4F3D7C79.30607(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 02/16/2012 03:32 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: >> Germán, >> >> >>> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:59:39 -0200 >>> From: "Germán A. Racca" <german.racca(a)gmail.com> >>> To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Subject: Re: BOINC x86_64 - anyone had this working recently? >>> Message-ID: <4F3D27EB.3060608(a)gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed >>> >>> On 02/16/2012 10:40 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: >>>> People, >>>> >>>> Some years ago this used to work for me but for the last few >>>> versions of >>>> Fedora that I have used (12, 14 and now 16) I haven't had any luck >>>> - the >>>> client keeps stopping. >>>> >>>> Has anyone got the latest version going on F16 x86_64? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Phil. >>> >>> Hi Phil: >>> >>> You have to add your username to the boing group, and then restart >>> your >>> computer. >> >> >> Did that - trying to add a project causes a "Connecting" message >> briefly >> and then immediately returns to "Disconnected" and I see in the >> terminal >> where I started the client: >> >> SIGSEGV: segmentation violation >> Stack trace (14 frames): >> /usr/lib64/libboinc.so.6(boinc_catch_signal+0x1bc)[0x316023753d] >> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x30b6636300] >> /lib64/libc.so.6(readdir+0x36)[0x30b66b7b06] >> >> /usr/lib64/libboinc.so.6(_Z8dir_scanPcP11__dirstreami+0x1f)[0x3160237ae7] >> /usr/lib64/libboinc.so.6(_Z8dir_sizePKcRdb+0x77)[0x3160237fc0] >> /usr/lib64/libboinc.so.6(_Z8dir_sizePKcRdb+0xe9)[0x3160238032] >> /usr/lib64/libboinc.so.6(_Z8dir_sizePKcRdb+0xe9)[0x3160238032] >> boinc_client[0x45bb02] >> boinc_client[0x45cc5d] >> boinc_client[0x42c0a2] >> boinc_client[0x47ba72] >> boinc_client[0x47bcb4] >> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed)[0x30b662169d] >> boinc_client[0x4135d9] >> >> Exiting... >> >> >> I suppose I should log a bug report somewhere but this is not a high >> priority app for me but it would be nice if it would "just work" . . >> >> Thanks, >> >> Phil. > > Phil: > > After adding my username to the boinc group, I made sure the service > was > enabled and running (using systemd), and then I started "boincmgr". > Then > I went to "Advanced -> Select computer -> Host name: localhost", and > as > password I put the content of the file > /var/lib/boinc/gui_rpc_auth.cfg > > But maybe you should file a bug. Thanks! - I eventually got it working with a blank password (ie only CR/LF i the file). Now my computer can be of use to some other people's scientific research again! Regards, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades, EO Cryonics Association of Australasia GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: phil(a)pricom.com.au

2 1

change the pic appeared on shutdown process.
by nathhuan 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

hi guys i am using fedora 16 now. i ofen see picture come out while i shut down the system. who can tell me how to change this picture? thanks Nathan

2 2

Decrypt password dialog losing focus in latest kernel?
by Steve Dowe 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, My laptop (ThinkPad T420) is set up to use encrypted lvm, so when I start it up I am prompted to enter my encryption passphrase. I've noticed, though, that with an external monitor connected via DisplayPort and using the latest kernel (3.2.6-3.fc16.x86_64), the password field doesn't have focus, so I cannot enter my drive encryption password and unlock the volume. This only happens with a second display connected. When I run using just my laptop's primary display, this issue doesn't occur. Has anyone else noticed this? I haven't found anything on bugzilla.redhat.com about this yet... Thanks, Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8+JsAACgkQff0deVwNl4j1AQCeIiGKwHqjftWwJT2o/k79Wbr+ qpYAmgKdSCAZdcWFHr+l42G3s2kCowYY =lfFQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Error X11 Maximum number of clients when starting firefox [SOLVED]
by Emilio Lopez 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

> Yesterday, I updated my fedora 16 Box and I get this error message > when starting Firefox : I don't know what was the problem, but I found a solution: removing ~/.kde Emilio.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
28
Older →

Jump to page: