On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Ric Moore <wayward4now(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:37 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:43 PM, linuxguy <linuxguy123(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Its now 2 weeks past the end of July, when we were told KDE 4.1 would
> > ship.
>
> It has.
>
> > I've been stuck with this crappy, half working KDE 4.0 interface
> > for 6 weeks. You could say I'm a bit miffed.
>
> Sucks for you.
>
> > Say whatever you want about Fedora being bleeding edge, etc, but this is
> > by far the worst release Fedora and Redhat has ever done.
>
> What does RedHat have to do with this?
>
> > As far as I
> > am concerned, the KDE team has knocked the credibility of Linux, Fedora
> > and the KDE team itself way, way back.
>
> Interesting opinion, I can't say I understand it. I'd argue you have
> done more damage. I'm willing to put together a few points if you're
> interested.
>
> > I am very disappointed with the current state of the Linux desktop as
> > demonstrated in F9.
>
> Gnome actually is pretty nice, not that I would use it full time... or
> by Linux desktop did you mean the K Desktop environment?
>
> > The people that allowed KDE4.0 to ship in F9 showed
> > a huge lapse in judgment.
>
> How so? I think they underestimated how many freeloaders would bitch
> about not having what they want when they want it.
You STILL labeling people again??
Yes, why do you ask?
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
(
www.pembo13.com )