No, the second rule should ONLY process when a message passes the first rule (and does NOT get bounced out to gmail.) I believe, please correct me if I'm wrong here, but I believe the way you've rewritten it, rule 2 will ALWAYS run, regardless of the outcome of rule 1. This will result in duplicate message being sent to the second e-mail address.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:10 PM, jdow jdow@earthlink.net wrote:
The basic rule to remember with procmail is that once the email is delivered processing is ended. So if the rule passes you must then clone the email and deliver the clone. That allows the rules to keep on processing.
I imagine you also want the second rule to continue processing as well.
Something akin to :0
!^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com ashley@pcraft.com
!^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com ashley@pcigrafx.com
!^From.*kirash4@gmail.com
!^To.*ashley@papillon.pcraft.**com ashley@papillon.pcraft.com
{ :0 c ! kirash4@gmail.com }
:0c
- ^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com ashley@pcraft.com
- ^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com ashley@pcigrafx.com
{ :0 c ! salesdept }
{^_^}
On 2013/01/23 20:00, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
The way this should work is as follows:
- new e-mail arrives at the recipient's box and procmail picks it up and
checks the X-Forward-For header
- if the header does NOT contain any of those listed, it forwards the
message to the specified gmail address
STOP <
- if the header exists and contains any of the matches listed, the
message gets dropped into the recipient's inbox AND
- it is at this point that I want it to also forward a copy of said
message to the second e-mail address
The first rule works as expected. Message comes in, first rule checks it and upon failing, bounces back out to gmail. Nothing happens after that. When the message returns, it passes the first rule and gets dropped in the recipient's box. When I added the second rule, nothing changed. The first keeps running as is and the second is simply ignored.
Now, perhaps I'm wrong in thinking that when it comes back and passes the first rule, it will also run through the second rule. Is this a case where I need to write things wrapped in a nest? Sort of like an IF .. THEN .. ELSE?
A
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:50 PM, jdow <jdow@earthlink.net mailto:jdow@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 2013/01/23 15:28, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: Ok, I'm still trying to figure this out. On the new, test
account, i can get it to log so I just need to figure out the other two. However, I recreated the same recipe on the test account and what I'm seeing in the log is the first part of the recipe only, it doesn't seem to do anything with the second part.
So this (adjusted for the test account): LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail VERBOSE=yes :0 * !^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com> <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com>> mytest@pcigrafx.com <mailto:mytest@pcigrafx.com> <mailto:ashley@pcigrafx.com <mailto:ashley@pcigrafx.com>> * !^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com> <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com>> mytest@pcraft.com <mailto:mytest@pcraft.com> <mailto:
ashley@pcraft.com
<mailto:ashley@pcraft.com>> * !^From.*kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com> <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com>> * !^To.*mytest@papillon.pcraft._**_com <mailto:mytest@papillon.**
pcraft.com mytest@papillon.pcraft.com> <mailto:ashley@papillon.__pcra**ft.com http://pcraft.com<mailto: ashley@papillon.**pcraft.com ashley@papillon.pcraft.com>> ! kirash4@gmail.com mailto:kirash4@gmail.com <mailto: ashley@gmail.com
<mailto:ashley@gmail.com>> :0c * ^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com> <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com>> mytest@pcigrafx.com <mailto:mytest@pcigrafx.com> <mailto:ashley@pcigrafx.com <mailto:ashley@pcigrafx.com>> * ^X-Forwarded-For: kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com> <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com <mailto:kirash4@gmail.com>> mytest@pcraft.com <mailto:mytest@pcraft.com> <mailto:
ashley@pcraft.com
<mailto:ashley@pcraft.com>> ! salesdept@pcraft.com <mailto:salesdept@pcraft.com> <mailto:salesdept@pcraft.com <mailto:salesdept@pcraft.com>> Ashley, it might pay to explicitly say, in words, what you think you want to do if the first rule passes, if the first rule does not pass and the second rule passes, and if neither rule passes. As it is your description of passing the first rule is the correct action for what you've developed as a rule. You have delivered the email and rule processing ceases at that point. So you might have to clone the output of the first rule to pass it to the second rule IF that is the action you want based on your disappointment at these rules doing what you told them to do. {^_^} -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users@lists.**fedoraproject.org<users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.__**org/mailman/listinfo/users <https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/users<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**__Mailing_list_guidelines<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/__Mailing_list_guidelines> <http://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
--
users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/usershttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**Mailing_list_guidelineshttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org