Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> >> But it seems to me that it should be easy enough to
cater for all
> >> users, by having a setting in some /etc/NM.conf which will allow NM to
> >> start with a specific connection before anyone logs in
> >> _if that is what one wants_,
> >> or if not requires the user to authenticate before connection.
> >
> >
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/F9Common#networkmanager-static
>
> I read this, and followed the instructions there as well as I could,
First, I haven't actually tired this yet, as I haven't had
time to
install F9 on any of my machines. But I will have a chance sometime
soon, maybe this weekend.
I've tried it with various versions of ifcfg-eth1 .
(It was suggested to me that giving an IPADDR when using dhcp
might confuse NM.)
In any case, my experience has been that as soon as I move ifcfg-eth1
to /etc/sysconfig/network-script/ , NM stops working,
with the message "You have been disconnected ..."
(So at least NM must be looking at this file.
I'm pretty sure it didn't do that earlier in its life.)
nm-applet doesn't start until you log in, but NetworkManager
starts at
boot if it is set to do so. My understanding is that NM (the service)
should start an interface at boot if ifcfg-<device> is set up correctly.
It's likely that mobile users wouldn't want an interface to come up if
it wasn't under their control (through nm-applet).
Depends what you mean by a "mobile user".
Personally, I would like NM to try to connect
to the last ESSID it succeeded in connecting to,
and if it can't connect then ask me which of the ESSIDs it sees
I want to connect to.
Just like Windows XP, in fact, which seems to me to have this about right.
I think I've seen that the NM service will be set to start
earlier in
the boot sequence in a soon-to-be-released update. The longer-term
solution would be to have services that require a network understand how
to wait for one to come up (through dBus, for example).
Actually, it is not too difficult to start them
in /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/ .
I just don't think it is a very rational arrangement.