2006/3/2, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com>:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:47, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2006/3/2, Ralph.Grothe(a)itdz-berlin.de <Ralph.Grothe(a)itdz-berlin.de>:
> > > Can you tell the rest of us what we are missing by running
> > > a 32-bit browser or is the difference just indescribable?
> > >
> you are pulling in 32 bit libs which eat up ram...
Oh, so the reason you like 64-bit is that the libs use
less ram? That's the first I've heard that...
if i load a 64 bit library... and have to load the 32 bit one aswell
cause i need the backwards stuff i waste ram for the 32 bit lib ;).
> and then again why are you using 64 bit fedora at all if you
dont like
> the 64 bit fuss? ;)
Because it still runs all the old stuff unchanged.
> backwards compat is nice but personally i prefer fixes instead of
> workarounds, just a matter of attitude.
>
> just curious...
You are asking many people to do a lot of work to
build/test/maintain/distribute additional versions. I'd
just like to know what to expect to see in return for
that extra work.
actually a real solution wouldnt need much more than a rebuild ;).
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell(a)gmail.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list