On 07/16/17 22:13, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@greshko.com mailto:ed.greshko@greshko.com> wrote:
On 07/16/17 20:09, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just upgraded my "spare" laptop (that's literally the hostname!) and I ran into > one small problem and one larger problem it seems. > > The small problem. I keep my own repository of certain packages not available > through other means on my main desktop accessed though autofs//nfs. > > The software center was able to access the metadata during the download phase but > system-upgrade apparently didn't download the packages assuming they were local. I > remember filing a bug for this with fedup... > > The bigger issue is everything says Fedora 26 (/etc/fedora-release) and Gnome > system information, but when I run dnf it's still looking at the Fedora 25 repos. > > Where does dnf look for $releasever? > Looking at the man page for dnf.conf $releasever Refers to the release version of operating system which DNF derives from information available in RPMDB. Is it possible you have multiple entries for fedora-release?
That was it! I guess system-upgrade uses a pretty big hammer and doesn't worry about multiple packages being installed.
Good...
You may want to run "dnf check --duplicates" to see if there are any additional issues. What happened to you should not have happened. The operative word being "should". :-)