On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Chris G <cl(a)isbd.net> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:32:26PM -0400, max bianco wrote:
> >
> > Ultimately, if any of you folks reading this want to give your Internet
access
> > a real kick in the rear end, get two connections and a load balancing
router.
> > You don't know what you're missing until you've tried this stunt
out.
> >
> >
> You've already got me thinking but, I want it with wireless, though i
> am not sure until I try. I wouldn't need to isp's though because I am
> not even getting the max speed out of one ISP with a wireless
> connection. I can have to NIC's in a box, can I have two wireless
> cards with separate ip's pulling down the info so i could effectively
> double my wireless connection speed? It seems plausible on the surface
> anyway.
>
Surely your connection to you ISP is *way* slower than even the
slowest wireless connection. Even an 11Mb/s wireless connection is
faster than all but the whizziest ISP connections. Are you *really*
getting slower than that on your wireless LAN?
Your right about that, except the connection at work is smokin but it
would still be useful for large transfers across the LAN,
music,movies, and such. Anyway I will start my own thread, as i am
getting off on a tangent and hijacking this one it seems.
Max