Greetings. I've been seeing some strange behavior with the "alpine" package in Fedora 8 and 9 recently.
The gist of it is that there don't seem to be any configuration files for alpine, even though RPM lists them.
Here's an example from a Fedora 8 system. I get the same thing on a Fedora 9 system.
[root@localsys ~]# grep alpine /var/log/yum.log Oct 27 16:58:27 Installed: alpine-2.00-1.fc8.i386
No complaints from the installer. OK, what got installed?
[root@localsys ~]# rpm -ql alpine /etc/pine.conf /etc/pine.conf.fixed /usr/bin/alpine /usr/bin/pico /usr/bin/pilot /usr/bin/rpdump /usr/bin/rpload /usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00 /usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00/README /usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00/tech-notes.txt /usr/share/man/man1/alpine.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/pico.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/pilot.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/rpdump.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/rpload.1.gz
That shows not one but two configuration files in /etc/.
On the other hand, there are no such configuration files:
[root@localsys ~]# ls -ld /etc/*pine* ls: cannot access /etc/*pine*: No such file or directory
Maybe something's wrong with the installation? RPM doesn't think so:
[root@localsys ~]# rpm --verify alpine [root@localsys ~]#
This is significant because the alpine binary seems to have been compiled with /usr/local as the default location for browsers, for instance. I won't repeat the output here, but try:
strings /usr/bin/alpine | grep netscape or strings /usr/bin/alpine | grep lynx
I suppose this could be "fixed" by changing individual .pinerc files, but that seems to be treating the symptom, not the problem.
Note that I have seen a directory:
/etc/alpine
on some systems, and on one system running Scientific Linux I do find a file:
/etc/alpine/pine.conf
On the Fedora systems that I've examined, either the /etc/alpine directory is missing altogether, or it is there but empty.
Is this a local problem, or are others seeing it too?
Thanks.
-- Mike