On 10/31/07, Paul Johnson <pauljohn32(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The unexpected bug introduced by frequent updates (much less
re-installs) have lost some of their charm for us.
...
In the past I've resisted adopting these longer lived distros because,
well, they get outdated and frustrating because they don't
interoperate with the rapidly changing part of the Linux world.
...
So maybe I don't want Scientific Linux or CentOS. Wish the
RedHat/Fedora Legacy group had not disbanded. For security updates on
a one year old distro, it was very handy.
I agree very much with your sentiment. On our servers we run
Scientific Linux. The desktops run Fedora.
The servers are great, but admittedly we use a much smaller set of
software. With the desktops, its either do updates frequently or do
them 500 at a time. I'd be a lot happier if the kernel was updated
less frequently (like with the server.)
Right now, I think the happy medium might be with the latest SL, and a
few applications like Firefox and Thunderbird compiled by hand in
/usr/local/...