On 06.06.2017 21:47, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> On 06.06.2017 20:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 06/06/2017 04:56 AM, Walter H. wrote:
>>> So .lan. can't be used.
> > It can be used, just be aware that maybe someday in the future it
> will have a different meaning.
>
> you're kidding;
> as it seems there is no defined TLD for exact this use ...
>
I'm not kidding. Why is it a problem?
> > Otherwise, just pick some random short selection of characters.
> It's really not that complicated.
>
> I replied to this mail with:
>
> if I interpret your reply correctly, I could also use just .waldi or
> .waldinet?
>
> and their reply was:
>
> If it's only for internal network, you can use .waldi or .waldinet.
>
Exactly. If you prefer that, then even better.
today I found this:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/
as it seems, will .home declared as special domain for private use
similar to RFC1918 IP addresses ...
I've the solution, or does anybody see a bug?
Thanks,
Walter