-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kam Leo wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007 2:48 PM, David Boles <dgboles(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Neither openSuSE nor Fedora are end-all products. Both distributions
make decent servers. However, neither is ready to replace Microsoft's
Windows OS and the applications for that OS. Some day perhaps; just
not today.
I am not familiar openSuSE. But I thought that, from what I have read,
that openSuSE was a desktop oriented type distribution.
Fedora is fast paced and has fewer restraints on me with configuring
a
system. I learn many things because of that pace.
Why do I have to exclusively run one variant of Linux? I have multiple
machines which are multi-booted.
An again Fedora is a desktop oriented distribution.
I see no problem, your choice of course, how many distributions you wish
to run. I would not think, if it was me, that I would run a desktop
distribution as a true server.
May I ask why you do that? When there are several, many, good server
oriented distributions, run desktop oriented distributions as servers?
- --
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAkd3D1MACgkQAO0wNI1X4QHibgCg9/Feht+9wA72qs/h2dzbitY/
dHEAoIVRNHzkaUjaoRGUd+RdJ5hrpPDd
=TgoZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----