Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:59:45 +0000
Andy Blanchard wrote:
> Unfortunately, "dig" has a syntax that can be considerably more convoluted
> than the equivalent in "nslookup".
Yea, I find it hysterical that the reason recommended for switching to
dig is because nslookup has an arcane user interface :-).
Smells to me like reins and crops versus brakes and accelerators; horses
were nice but they just couldn't outdo their replacements: the autos.
I don't really see the difficulty in somethings as simple as
dig @"nameserver I want to use" "what I'm looking up"
"record type"
Sorry to all :/ Just couldn't get my keyboard to shut on this one...
:m)