On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Anne Wilson <cannewilson(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On Saturday 21 June 2008 00:47:24 Mike Bird wrote:
> The other distros are supporting both KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.x for one to
> three years. This allows people to migrate once KDE 4.x meets their
> needs.
As I mentioned elsewhere, I have one system that has both 3.5 and 4.0 running.
Compromises are necessary for this, and it results in a system considerably
less stable than the Fedora version. IMO, Fedora's decision was the right
one. There was plenty of warning that it may not suit all, and staying with
F8 was always a choice.
F7 was also a choice... just saying.
Arthur - you wrote "They'll wait till Fedora users and other
similar early
adopters have helped iron out the bugs. Kinda like Pulse Audio,
NetworkManager, etc". Yes, someone has to be an early adopter for bugs to be
Yup, and I applaud Fedora for that. That is one of Fedora's benefits
to the linux community
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
(
www.pembo13.com )