On 01/19/2014 07:20 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: <>
IOW it *was* in plaintext. It did however also have a "Rich Text" alternative part, which presumably is what violates the Guidelines
if you look up from bottom, you will also see that it has;
}> --e89a8f646f8f93fa7504f051c062 }> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 }> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
which also violates guidelines.