On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:34 AM, lee lee@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:42 PM, lee wrote:
I made a bug report suggesting to fix their misunderstanding of what "disabled" means. It would have been very easy to fix, but they declined.
Why should I make any further bug reports about systemd when they don't want to even fix important things like this?
I would suggest that the misunderstanding is on your part instead as noted in another reply.
Please look up the meaning of "disabled" in some dictionaries and ask some arbitrary people what it means.
There's a difference between "disabled" and "permanently disabled"; no need to look at a dictionary.
Did you see my earlier post about kernel module loading? [1]
A kernel module can be blacklisted but it can be loaded if need be. In the same way:
If A depends on B and B is masked: you start A, B doesn't start and A doesn't start.
If A depends on B and B is disabled: you start A, B starts and A starts.
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2014-July/451640.html