I concur. I use FC for my desktop / laptop, and Scientific Linux (another RHAS rebuild) for our cluster and servers. For high performance computing you are not concerned with the latest greatest version of xwindows or grub, but more concerned with stability. RHAS rebuild projects give us that stability ( I'm still running 2.6.9-34EL ). But for my desktop where I am tweaking this, compile test programs, evaluating software for other users, its good to be on the bleeding edge, even if sometimes you get cut... :-)
- Donald Tripp dtripp@hawaii.edu ---------------------------------------------- HPC Systems Administrator High Performance Computing Center University of Hawai'i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 http://www.hpc.uhh.hawaii.edu
On Dec 21, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:25:44 +0000, Anne Wilson wrote:
Fedora. I understand about the lack of manpower in volunteer situations, but I'm less than happy. If I have to install afresh to get a secure system I'll probably change to CentOS rather than install FC6 on those boxes.
Anne
I agree. I will keep FC for my desktop because I want the latest and greatest and I don't mind rather frequent updates. On the other hand, the servers I manage are still running FC4, and I started a migration plan to go for CentOS a few months ago. Now that Legacy is gone, I will have to accelerate the process.
Akemi
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list