On 11/14/2010 03:23 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:33:10 +0530, Sawrub wrote:
> Running Fedora 14 x86_64, i was trying to search for a package using
> YUM. The search results lists multiple versions [Fc12, Fc13, Fc14] and
> different arch [i686 and x86_64], of which i just need it to list
> against Fc14 and x86_64. Why is this so, can we prevent this or is this
> a bad/undesirable feature in yum.
Packages, which have not been rebuilt for F-14, may still contain an
older distribution tag (such as ".fc12") in their package release name.
That was clear that searching for a packages under the repos may list a
package that is not of the same OS version [if its not build for that
version] all i wanted was to know that why are they included in the
results for a different version of OS. Since as i have read that
installing packages like this ['OS version xx' packages under 'OS
version yy' ] should not be encouraged. And since YUM is there to make
package installation easy, practices like this should not be there there.
With the x86_64 arch you can also install and run i686 for 32-bit
compatibility. Not all i686 packages are available in the Yum repository
for x86_64, though. Just a subset.
Yes that i know, all i wanted to say here is that is it a good practice
to list a package of different arch when the one for the requested is
not available under the default search. Packages of different arch
[except noarch] should only be listed against a special YUM option [like
--enable-different-arch] or be listed under a different head in the
default listing [like --Different Architecture--].
> Stack trace :
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [sawrub@sawrub ~]$ yum list available pidgin*
That isn't a stack trace.
My bad, will keep in mind
--
Saurabh Sharma
Linux user number: 490644
http://sawrub-blog.blogspot.com/
Open your doors.......It's time to look beyond Windows