On 03/21/2011 06:18 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius<rc040203(a)freenet.de> said:
> * Try to open 2 side-by-side terminals on Fedora 15's Gnome 3:
> I haven't managed to do so, yet.
Really?
Yes, I am absolutely serious:
I haven't found any possibility to open 2 (or more) side-by-side
terminal windows on Fedora 15's Gnome 3.
I also think Gnome's ergonomy has massively regressed between Gnome 2
and Fedora 15's Gnome 3. It has rendered working with Gnome from "fair"
to "uneffective" and "clumsy".
I played around with gnome-shell on a couple of the graphics
test days and was not impressed,
Neither am I. However, I am aware the graphics are
mostly a matter of
personal taste.
but I haven't had a chance to look at
it again (or any of F15 unfortunately). My standard desktop is 3 xterms
(real xterm, not GNOME terminal) side by side. Browser windows are
workspace 2 (with keyboard shortcut Win-F2), games (at home) or docs (at
work) on 3, and 4 for miscellaneous stuff. I tend to avoid overlapping
windows, as that slows me down.
Me desktop layout is similar. 6 workspaces in
total.
One workspace for thunderbird and firefox, one workspace for "file
browsers", 3 workspaces each containing several terminals (grouped by
tasks I am working on) and one "spare" workspace. No compiz, no desktop
effects (sense-free eye-candy and resource drain)
I disliked the panel-on-top with gnome-shell; the first thing I
always
do under older GNOME is move the top panel to the right and set the
bottom panel to auto-hide.
There was time, I used to move it to the left. As this
didn't work out
well, I swallowed the top menu and learnt to live with it ;)
Wtih 16x{9,10} monitors, vertical screen
space is the premium.
Agreed.
IMHO one impediment to the perpetual "next year is the year of
the Linux
Desktop"
Wrt. Gnome 3 and Fedora, such statements make me laugh. I am
considering
them to be shallow marketing word bubbles without any substance.
Ralf