Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> writes:
Am 29.07.2013 18:08, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> writes:
>
>> Am 28.07.2013 23:35, schrieb lee:
>>> Marko Vojinovic <vvmarko(a)gmail.com> writes:
>>>> Nevertheless, I have seen various proposals for RPM to include the
>>>> concept of soft dependencies. But AFAIK, it hasn't happened so far.
>>>
>>> RPM doesn't support suggested packages? Are you serious?
>>
>> *no*
>
> So does it or not?
it does *not*
That sucks.
>> if whatever is *linked* against whatever library
>> the library need to be installed and loaded at
>> startup, if it is not installed the binary crashs
>
> It doesn't crash, it only doesn't run
*wrong*
if something is linked against the avahi libraries
and they are not installed it will *crash*
It won't run to begin with but say it cannot find this or that library,
and something that doesn't run can't crash.
--
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "No error here")
signal(error ("No error here"))
error("No %s here" "error")