On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:27:03 +0100
cen <imbacen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That is what worries me actually. Apparently libc++abi has to be
linked to libc++ but that is not the case with current package:
ldd /usr/lib64/libc++.so
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe1c7d8000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f09d5072000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f09d4cac000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f09d49a3000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007f09d479b000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f09d4584000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000055b90043d000)
I am not a pro in C++, compilers and linkers so perhaps someone with
more knowledge can explain how this is supposed to work in the first
place.
I also cannot find libc++abi or libcxx-abi in the repo unless it is
"cleverly" named as something else.
Perhaps also relavant:
https://whatofhow.wordpress.com/2016/03/01/libclibcabi-on-linux/
I'm not highly knowledgeable of C++. But, a quick look around brings
me to the conclusion that clang++ in Fedora is not complete. I
couldn't find libcxxabi or libsupc either.
We can hope that your person with more knowledge will appear.
But it seems that libcxxabi is not in fedora, but requested,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332306