On 03/23/2010 03:55 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Hello,
sorry for the off-topic.
Tipically when I work with LVM on Linux (RHEL/CentOS 5 and/or Fedora
11/12), I create the physical volume directly on the whole disk.
Historically one created a partition on the disk, eventually big as the
whole disk and then marked it as 8e type (LVM), and then the PV on the
partition.
With recent kernels/LVM2 user tools it became safe/normal to create it
directly on disk device, and so I normally do.
What about same thing for ext3 filesystem?
So creating for example an ext3 filesystem directly on the /dev/sda device?
Does this imply any risk/problem?
Does it change anything if the underlying device is instead managed by
device-mapper-multipath, so for example the device name is
/dev/mapper/mpath1?
I ask because, used with creating PVs, VGs and LVs, today I had to
create a plain filesystem on mpath device and forgot to create a
partition on it but issued the mkfs command directly on it... and then
mounted it... now I have this doubt
I've built filesystems (ext2 and ext3) for a long time on thumb drives
(and certainly on floppies) without partitioning, so yes, you can do it.
On the other hand, a partition table doesn't take any capacity away
from a drive so there's really no need to skip partitioning other than
laziness. :-) (and yes, I can be a lazy cuss)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, C2 Hosting ricks(a)nerd.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- "I was contemplating the immortal words of Socrates when he said, -
- 'I drank what?'" -- Val Kilmer in "Real Genius"
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------