finding missing font file (eurm10.map)

[Ranjan Maitra]

Hi,

On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run LaTeX:

kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 eurm10
 mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10.
 mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file.
 kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
 (see the transcript file for additional information)
 !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 600 not found

I looked around and came across a post from 2020 on Arch forums that says that I potentially need texlive-most, however this is not available on F39.

How do I get around the above error?

Many thanks for your suggestions, and my very best wishes,
Ranjan

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 4:48 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
 wrote:
> On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run LaTeX:
>
> kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 eurm10
>  mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10.
>  mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file.
>  kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
>  (see the transcript file for additional information)
>  !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 600 not found
>
> I looked around and came across a post from 2020 on Arch forums that says that I potentially need texlive-most, however this is not available on F39.
>
> How do I get around the above error?

On my system, that font file is in the texlive-amsfonts package.  Do
you have that installed already?

[Ranjan Maitra]

On Thu Feb08'24 04:52:13PM, Jerry James wrote:
> From: Jerry James 
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 4:48 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
>  wrote:
> > On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run LaTeX:
> >
> > kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 eurm10
> >  mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10.
> >  mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file.
> >  kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
> >  (see the transcript file for additional information)
> >  !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 600 not found
> >
> > I looked around and came across a post from 2020 on Arch forums that says that I potentially need texlive-most, however this is not available on F39.
> >
> > How do I get around the above error?
>
> On my system, that font file is in the texlive-amsfonts package.  Do
> you have that installed already?

Thanks, yes, I do have it installed!

$ sudo dnf install texlive-amsfonts
 Last metadata expiration check: 1:15:21 ago on Thu 08 Feb 2024 04:52:50 PM CST.
 Package texlive-amsfonts-11:svn61937-69.fc39.noarch is already installed.
 Dependencies resolved.
 Nothing to do.
 Complete!

Best wishes,
Ranjan

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 5:10 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
 wrote:
> Thanks, yes, I do have it installed!
>
> $ sudo dnf install texlive-amsfonts
>  Last metadata expiration check: 1:15:21 ago on Thu 08 Feb 2024 04:52:50 PM CST.
>  Package texlive-amsfonts-11:svn61937-69.fc39.noarch is already installed.
>  Dependencies resolved.
>  Nothing to do.
>  Complete!

In that case I suggest reinstalling it so that the texlive triggers fire again.

[Ranjan Maitra]

On Thu Feb08'24 05:56:26PM, Jerry James wrote:
> From: Jerry James 
> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:56:26 -0700
> To: Community support for Fedora users 
> CC: Ranjan Maitra 
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users 
> Subject: Re: finding missing font file (eurm10.map)
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 5:10 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
>  wrote:
> > Thanks, yes, I do have it installed!
> >
> > $ sudo dnf install texlive-amsfonts
> >  Last metadata expiration check: 1:15:21 ago on Thu 08 Feb 2024 04:52:50 PM CST.
> >  Package texlive-amsfonts-11:svn61937-69.fc39.noarch is already installed.
> >  Dependencies resolved.
> >  Nothing to do.
> >  Complete!
>
> In that case I suggest reinstalling it so that the texlive triggers fire again.

Thanks, this did not do anything different. Are you sure that this font is in this package?

Thanks again for your help!

Best wishes,
Ranjan

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:43 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
 wrote:
> Thanks, this did not do anything different. Are you sure that this font is in this package?

$ rpm -ql texlive-amsfonts
...
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/afm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.afm
...
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.tfm
...
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfb
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfm
...

Maybe the "at 600" part is significant?  We have reached the limits of
my knowledge, I'm afraid.  Hopefully somebody else will know what is
going on.

[Ranjan Maitra]

On Thu Feb08'24 09:47:29PM, Jerry James wrote:
> From: Jerry James
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:43 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
>  wrote:
> > Thanks, this did not do anything different. Are you sure that this font is in this package?
>
> $ rpm -ql texlive-amsfonts
> ...
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/afm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.afm
> ...
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.tfm
> ...
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfb
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/euler/eurm10.pfm
> ...
>
> Maybe the "at 600" part is significant?  We have reached the limits of
> my knowledge, I'm afraid.  Hopefully somebody else will know what is
> going on.

Yes, I hope so too.

Thank you again!

Best wishes,
Ranjan