I have a small home network, with two machines on it. One runs Windows 8.1. The other runs Fedora 20.
I recently figured out how to open a Samba share on the F20 machine, and set up a trusted firewall zone.
Now I keep getting notices like this:
"Desktop Sharing: refused uninvited connection attempt from..." followed by an IP address and port number. The IP address is that of the Windows 8.1 machine, which seems to be trying a different port each time.
I've looked at every administrative tool on both machines, and I can't figure out what that "desktop sharing" is all about, whether it would benefit me to have those two machines connect in this way, or how to make it happen if I wanted to.
I need the help of someone more familiar with Windows 8.1 than myself--for I suspect this is some new Windows feature that the Samba server and client software is not designed to recognize, much less emulate.
This is the only anomaly. The two machines are perfectly capable of sharing files with one another, at least when I connect as one user with the comparable user account on the other machine. Which is all I was really after.
I'm going through all this because I want to replicate my F20 setup on another, more powerful machine. And I'm going to do it with a "clean install."
Temlakos
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:37 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
I keep getting notices like this:
"Desktop Sharing: refused uninvited connection attempt from..." followed by an IP address and port number. The IP address is that of the Windows 8.1 machine, which seems to be trying a different port each time.
Generally, that means the desktop interface (your windows, menus, mouse and keyboard) can be remotely controlled/accessed from another computer. So, using your Linux computer, you could act as if you were using your Windows computer, or vice versa.
If you don't need that functionality, then deny it, and go through reconfiguring your Windows machine to stop offering to share its desktop. Really, it shouldn't be making that attempt unless you initiate it. If it's doing it automatically, I wonder if you have a compromised Windows box.
On 06/11/2014 12:43 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:37 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
I keep getting notices like this:
"Desktop Sharing: refused uninvited connection attempt from..." followed by an IP address and port number. The IP address is that of the Windows 8.1 machine, which seems to be trying a different port each time.
Generally, that means the desktop interface (your windows, menus, mouse and keyboard) can be remotely controlled/accessed from another computer. So, using your Linux computer, you could act as if you were using your Windows computer, or vice versa.
If you don't need that functionality, then deny it, and go through reconfiguring your Windows machine to stop offering to share its desktop. Really, it shouldn't be making that attempt unless you initiate it. If it's doing it automatically, I wonder if you have a compromised Windows box.
A compromised WINDOWS machine?....is that even POSSIBLE!?...LOL! (Sorry!....I just COULDN'T resist!)
EGO II
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2014, EGO-II.1 sent:
A compromised WINDOWS machine?....is that even POSSIBLE!?...LOL! (Sorry!....I just COULDN'T resist!)
I feel compromised if I ever have to use one... :-\
On 06/11/2014 10:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2014, EGO-II.1 sent:
A compromised WINDOWS machine?....is that even POSSIBLE!?...LOL! (Sorry!....I just COULDN'T resist!)
I feel compromised if I ever have to use one... :-\
I use a Windows machine for one reason only: because I have certain applications for which I have yet to find a good Linux counterpart or counterparts.
For that matter, I have yet to find any kind of file-sharing server that can compete with Samba. Which is one reason why I install samba even to share files with other Linux machines.
If I'm missing something, maybe someone can let me know.
Temlakos
On 2014-06-11 18:16, Temlakos wrote:
On 06/11/2014 10:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2014, EGO-II.1 sent:
A compromised WINDOWS machine?....is that even POSSIBLE!?...LOL! (Sorry!....I just COULDN'T resist!)
I feel compromised if I ever have to use one... :-\
I use a Windows machine for one reason only: because I have certain applications for which I have yet to find a good Linux counterpart or counterparts.
For that matter, I have yet to find any kind of file-sharing server that can compete with Samba. Which is one reason why I install samba even to share files with other Linux machines.
If I'm missing something, maybe someone can let me know.
Temlakos
Between Linux boxes try sshfs:
yum install fuse-sshfs
suomi
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 12:16 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
For that matter, I have yet to find any kind of file-sharing server that can compete with Samba. Which is one reason why I install samba even to share files with other Linux machines.
I found Samba to be a complete pain to use on Linux, so I haven't used it for years. I had to add users to it. It would mangle permissions down to the basic Windows ones, unless you configured advanced Samba options that weren't set by default. Also, I'd frequently find that it was dead slow in one direction (one computer could copy files over quickly, but trying it the other way around, was slower than floppy disc drives).
I just use NFS, and the autofs thingummy so that any calls to /net/servername/sharename (replacing servername with the hostname of the server, and sharename with the name of the exported directory), simple connects to that exported share without me "mounting" things, neither manually, nor with fstab (which is horrible for things that aren't permanent mounts).