On 08.07.2014 01:15, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:08:48AM +0200, poma wrote:
On 08.07.2014 00:53, David Benfell wrote:
poma writes:
What is the "sediment" in the thread context?
I suspect the word that was meant here is 'sentiment'.
Yeah it comes to mind, but then what would be the "sentiment" in the thread context?
*plonk*
And people tend to say systmed developers are rude. :) Thanks Greg!
poma
On 07/07/2014 04:16 PM, poma wrote:
On 08.07.2014 01:15, Greg KH wrote:
*plonk*
And people tend to say systmed developers are rude. :) Thanks Greg!
You do understand, don't you, that he's just publicly killfiled you and that he won't be seeing your response? The only reason, BTW, that I haven't done the same, yet, is because you sometimes say something that's both relevant and useful. So far, your signal/noise ratio has been high enough that I'm willing to put up with you, but it's been getting very close lately. Frankly, I'm astonished that you haven't been subjected to moderation because you've been so abusive.
On 08.07.2014 01:39, Joe Zeff wrote:
You do understand, don't you, that he's just publicly killfiled you and that he won't be seeing your response? The only reason, BTW, that I haven't done the same, yet, is because you sometimes say something that's both relevant and useful. So far, your signal/noise ratio has been high enough that I'm willing to put up with you, but it's been getting very close lately. Frankly, I'm astonished that you haven't been subjected to moderation because you've been so abusive.
Thank you very much but your interpretation is unnecessary. And please don't project your frustrations on me, and do not call on others to do the same. That is abusive. OK.
poma
On 07/07/2014 05:12 PM, poma wrote:
Thank you very much but your interpretation is unnecessary. And please don't project your frustrations on me, and do not call on others to do the same. That is abusive.
If I really believed that it would be in this list's best interests to have you moderated, I'd ask the moderators to take action, as I did last year when your actions got out of hand. So far, it hasn't gotten that bad although it's getting more and more tempting.
On 08.07.2014 02:43, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/07/2014 05:12 PM, poma wrote:
Thank you very much but your interpretation is unnecessary. And please don't project your frustrations on me, and do not call on others to do the same. That is abusive.
If I really believed that it would be in this list's best interests to have you moderated, I'd ask the moderators to take action, as I did last year when your actions got out of hand. So far, it hasn't gotten that bad although it's getting more and more tempting.
Your indications are the least presumptuous. And again, do not project your frustrations on me, and do not call on others to do the same. That is abusive.
poma
On 08.07.2014 01:16, poma wrote:
On 08.07.2014 01:15, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:08:48AM +0200, poma wrote:
On 08.07.2014 00:53, David Benfell wrote:
poma writes:
What is the "sediment" in the thread context?
I suspect the word that was meant here is 'sentiment'.
Yeah it comes to mind, but then what would be the "sentiment" in the thread context?
*plonk*
And people tend to say systmed developers are rude. :) Thanks Greg!
By the way it was your advice Greg, to talk to people directly, however actually it seems it is not valid for you. Talk about authenticity.
poma