Paul Smith wrote:
Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 for package: transcode --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 is needed by package transcode
I see that livna has transcode 1.0.0-0.lvn.3.3 in their unstable repo since 28th September, so its obviously being tested out.
Sharon.
On 9/29/05, Sharon Kimble sharonm63@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 for package: transcode --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 is needed by package transcode
I see that livna has transcode 1.0.0-0.lvn.3.3 in their unstable repo since 28th September, so its obviously being tested out.
Then, if mjpegtools depends on a unstable transcode version, it would have been wiser not having made mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 available on the stable repository.
Paul
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:39 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
On 9/29/05, Sharon Kimble sharonm63@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 for package: transcode --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 is needed by package transcode
I see that livna has transcode 1.0.0-0.lvn.3.3 in their unstable repo since 28th September, so its obviously being tested out.
Then, if mjpegtools depends on a unstable transcode version, it would have been wiser not having made mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 available on the stable repository.
Paul
You are reading that backwards. Transcode depends on libmjpegtools not the other way around.
The transcode package installed specifically requires libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 and since the libmjpegutils library is being updated and would remove that file, it fails because doing so would break the installed dependency.
This may be a transcode issue for requiring an explicit library file, but appears to be related to the installed version, not the unstable/testing version.
On 9/30/05, Jeff Vian jvian10@charter.net wrote:
Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 for package: transcode --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 is needed by package transcode
I see that livna has transcode 1.0.0-0.lvn.3.3 in their unstable repo since 28th September, so its obviously being tested out.
Then, if mjpegtools depends on a unstable transcode version, it would have been wiser not having made mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 available on the stable repository.
You are reading that backwards. Transcode depends on libmjpegtools not the other way around.
The transcode package installed specifically requires libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 and since the libmjpegutils library is being updated and would remove that file, it fails because doing so would break the installed dependency.
This may be a transcode issue for requiring an explicit library file, but appears to be related to the installed version, not the unstable/testing version.
Thanks, Jeff. Meanwhile, I uninstalled transcode and mjpegtools. Then, I Installed mjpegtools again and, subsequently, transcode, and the reported problem of dependencies disappeared.
Paul