Isn't that what you would want? A non-event?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
A boring update
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
On 11/03/2015 03:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
A boring update
Not for me: # dnf system-upgrade --releasever 23 download ... Skipping packages with broken dependencies: python-pexpect
What's interesting about python-pexpect is its state in the repos: dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/23/SRPMS/p/python-pexpect-4.0.1-4.fc23.src.rpm dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/source/SRPMS/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.src.rpm dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/i386/os/Packages/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.noarch.rpm dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/x86_64/os/Packages/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.noarch.rpm
In other words, the 23 update repos in inconsistent shape.
Ralf
On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
A boring update
Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-)
On 3 November 2015 at 17:12, Dave Cross davorg@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
A boring update
Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-)
I wish. The update as such was uneventful, but now I can't get a login screen.
1) Did the dnf update of 3055 packages 2) Rebooted and installed F23 with no errors 3) On booting the new system, got a low-res login (for KDE). Investigation showed that the akmod-nvidia race condition bug is still there, so installed kmod-nvidia by hand and rebooted. 4) Now I get a text-mode log of update progress, ending with:
[ OK] Reached target Switch Root. Starting Switch Root...
After which nothing happens. I tried removing the proprietary Nvidia stuff but it didn't help. I also tried switching to GDM On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
A boring update
Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-) and SDDM (my usual DM is KDM) and no difference.
There is nothing obviously wrong in journalctl.
I'm out of ideas.
poc
On 11/03/2015 03:19 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
- Did the dnf update of 3055 packages
- Rebooted and installed F23 with no errors
- On booting the new system, got a low-res login (for KDE).
Investigation showed that the akmod-nvidia race condition bug is still there, so installed kmod-nvidia by hand and rebooted. 4) Now I get a text-mode log of update progress, ending with:
[ OK] Reached target Switch Root. Starting Switch Root...
2 things.. 1, tail /var/log/Xorg.0.log
mine shows this at the end: [ 1478.000] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x800"x0.0 71.00 1280 1328 1360 1440 800 802 808 823 -hsync -vsync (49.3 kHz eP)
maybe change to lightdm? do you have another DM ( WM?) besides KDE?? maybe xfce e19...
On 3 November 2015 at 20:25, Paul Cartwright pbcartwright@gmail.com wrote:
2 things.. 1, tail /var/log/Xorg.0.log
mine shows this at the end: [ 1478.000] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x800"x0.0 71.00 1280 1328 1360 1440 800 802 808 823 -hsync -vsync (49.3 kHz eP)
I see errors both with Nvidia and Nouveau. "/dev/fb0: no such file or directory"
Aside from that, I've noticed an additional problem: /home is not being mounted. It's a btrfs filesystem and when trying to mount it manually I get:
mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'
I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference.
How can btrfs not work? Seriously?
poc
On 3 November 2015 at 21:25, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallaghan@gmail.com wrote:
mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'
I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference.
Just confirmed that /home does still mount correctly under F22.
poc
On 03/11/15 14:42, Neal Becker wrote:
A boring update
Not for me it wasn't!
root@nellie 10:27:06 ~ # dnf --best --allowerasing --refresh system-upgrade download --releasever=23 Fedora 23 - i386 655 kB/s | 39 MB 01:01 PostInstallerF-updates 2.7 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free - Updates 399 kB/s | 103 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree - Updates 9.8 kB/s | 1.3 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free 1.0 MB/s | 408 kB 00:00 Adobe Systems Incorporated 6.3 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 PostInstallerF 137 kB/s | 533 kB 00:03 Fedora 23 - i386 - Updates 564 kB/s | 3.8 MB 00:06 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree 514 kB/s | 129 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Wed Nov 4 10:30:15 2015. Error: package kf5-kdesu-5.15.0-2.fc23.i686 requires kf5-filesystem >= 5.15.0, but none of the providers can be installed
-- Chris R.
On 11/04/15 18:32, Christopher Ross wrote:
On 03/11/15 14:42, Neal Becker wrote:
A boring update
Not for me it wasn't!
root@nellie 10:27:06 ~ # dnf --best --allowerasing --refresh system-upgrade download --releasever=23 Fedora 23 - i386 655 kB/s | 39 MB 01:01 PostInstallerF-updates 2.7 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free - Updates 399 kB/s | 103 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree - Updates 9.8 kB/s | 1.3 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free 1.0 MB/s | 408 kB 00:00 Adobe Systems Incorporated 6.3 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 PostInstallerF 137 kB/s | 533 kB 00:03 Fedora 23 - i386 - Updates 564 kB/s | 3.8 MB 00:06 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree 514 kB/s | 129 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Wed Nov 4 10:30:15 2015. Error: package kf5-kdesu-5.15.0-2.fc23.i686 requires kf5-filesystem >= 5.15.0, but none of the providers can be installed
Some folks having difficulties may be better served by making sure they have both dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 and python2-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 installed. Not sure if these have been moved to stable yet so you may have to get them from "updates-testing".
Also, KDE users may have some problems with upgrades until
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-084749eee7
gets ironed out. It was noted on the KDE list that "probably broken dependencies, due to botched kf5-5.15.0 push to stable updates not working properly (2 days ago), it's being worked on."
On Wednesday 04 Nov 2015 18:43:23 Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/04/15 18:32, Christopher Ross wrote:
On 03/11/15 14:42, Neal Becker wrote:
A boring update
Also, KDE users may have some problems with upgrades until
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-084749eee7
That probably answers my question about finding this after the upgrade... 'dnf upgrade'....
Skipping packages with broken dependencies: kf5-kdesu x86_64 5.15.0-2.fc23 updates
I did this to upgrade from F22...
dnf --releasever=23 --setopt=deltarpm=false distro-sync --nogpgcheck
Which worked for me. Mostly...
On 11/04/2015 11:43 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Some folks having difficulties may be better served by making sure they have both dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 and python2-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 installed.
This doesn't change much in my case.
The sad truth is the f23 repos currently are inconsistent.
Ralf
-
Christopher Ross -
Dave Cross -
Ed Greshko -
Erik P. Olsen -
Neal Becker -
Patrick O'Callaghan -
Paul Cartwright -
Ralf Corsepius -
Richard Ibbotson -
Terry Polzin