KDE 3.1.95 rpm install

[Eric A. Constant]

I am having some trouble getting the new KDE beta up and running.

I had/have 3.1.4 running in Fedora.

I downloaded the 3.1.95 fedora rpms from ftp.kde.org, got a few extra 
packages to satisfy dependencies, got out of x and did an rpm -Uvh on 
the directory containing all the necessary packages.  Seemed to go off 
without a hitch.  The only messages were that certain packages had 
already been installed.

I went to start up x again, logged in and found that I was still in KDE 
3.1.4.

What did I do wrong or what do I still need to do to get 3.1.95 going?

Do I need to uninstall the old kde?  edit some config or xsession 
files?  I'm not even sure where the new KDE files installed.  Any help 
would greatly be appreciated.

Thanks
Eric

[Markku Kolkka]

Eric A. Constant kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika perjantai 30. 
tammikuuta 2004 22:52):
>  What did I do wrong or what do I still need to do to get
>  3.1.95 going? 
The Fedora development repository has KDE 3.1.95, I added it to 
my /etc/yum.conf, did "yum update 'kde*'" and now I have 3.1.95 
running.

-- 
	Markku Kolkka
	markku.kolkka(a)iki.fi

[David Cary Hart]

On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 17:56, Markku Kolkka wrote:

>  The Fedora development repository has KDE 3.1.95, I added it to 
>  my /etc/yum.conf, did "yum update 'kde*'" and now I have 3.1.95 
>  running.
>   
More importantly, are you glad that you did?
>  -- 
>  	Markku Kolkka
>  	markku.kolkka(a)iki.fi 
                               ---------
            Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence

[Markku Kolkka]

David C. Hart kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai 31. 
tammikuuta 2004 01:12):
>  On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 17:56, Markku Kolkka wrote:
>  > The Fedora development repository has KDE 3.1.95, I added it
>  > to my /etc/yum.conf, did "yum update 'kde*'" and now I have
>  > 3.1.95 running.
>
>  More importantly, are you glad that you did? 
Yes.

-- 
	Markku Kolkka
	markku.kolkka(a)iki.fi