Had an interesting error pop up after I ran Avira on this computer
gvfs-metadata segment fault 11
I would assume it was Avira that produced this fault
I ran this command rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata
I will test and see if it repaired it.
Michael
On 17 April 2010 20:09, Michael Miles mmamiga6@gmail.com wrote:
Had an interesting error pop up after I ran Avira on this computer
gvfs-metadata segment fault 11
I would assume it was Avira that produced this fault
I ran this command rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata
I will test and see if it repaired it.
Please get a blog. Your noise goes out to thousands of people and it really isn't as interesting as you seem to think.
-- Sam
On 04/17/2010 01:22 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
On 17 April 2010 20:09, Michael Milesmmamiga6@gmail.com wrote:
Had an interesting error pop up after I ran Avira on this computer
gvfs-metadata segment fault 11
I would assume it was Avira that produced this fault
I ran this command rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata
I will test and see if it repaired it.
Please get a blog. Your noise goes out to thousands of people and it really isn't as interesting as you seem to think.
-- Sam
You know, if have nothing nice to say then please don't say anything I found your comment very rude sir
On 17 April 2010 21:36, Michael Miles mmamiga6@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/17/2010 01:22 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
On 17 April 2010 20:09, Michael Milesmmamiga6@gmail.com wrote:
Had an interesting error pop up after I ran Avira on this computer
gvfs-metadata segment fault 11
I would assume it was Avira that produced this fault
I ran this command rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata
I will test and see if it repaired it.
Please get a blog. Your noise goes out to thousands of people and it really isn't as interesting as you seem to think.
You know, if have nothing nice to say then please don't say anything I found your comment very rude sir
That was deliberate. I find your mail etiquette very rude as well. The difference is that I was being rude to you personally to make my point. You are being rude to every subscriber to this list. I would suggest that as you seem to have very little sensible to say, that you follow your own advise Sir.
You need to consider that this list is a broadcast medium. We have no choice about which posts make it to our mailboxes, everything you send, whether relevant or interesting makes it to all of our inboxes. It would be more efficient if you filtered yourself at source than we all independently filter you at the time of reception, but I'm quite willing to do the latter if you like - but then you won't get the benefit of my help, which you've found useful at least once.
I reviewed your contribution to this list over the past four weeks which you have been posting and found lots of examples of bad behaviour. As an example, when in one post about what kind of GPU Gene should buy, Andrew Haley asked you why you felt you needed CUDA support, you couldn't answer. Then you came back later and started a new post (new thread) with the following:
=========== I just googled cuda applications fedora 12 and it seems there applications sprouting up now.
Another year and linux should catch up, I hope it is not that long
It sure is one to follow as GPU computing is a cheap way to increase performance on your machines ===========
The point being, if I or anyone else wanted to know this information or perhaps wanted to form an educated opinion, we are just as (if not more) capable of trawling search engines than you are. This apparently wasn't enough for you - you felt the need to inform us that ATI were also developing something like CUDA - again, you felt the need to broadcast this information using the following new post (I've reproduced it in it's entirety):
=========== Ati has put out CAL which is Cuda for ATI machines. Same thing, more software needs support but will come to light. ===========
In summary - your mailing list behaviour is rude and annoying. I'm glad I got your attention, so perhaps you can take this as a piece of advise:
It's better to stay silent and look a fool, rather than post and remove all doubt. (to paraphrase Mark Twain)
-- Sam
On 04/17/2010 02:23 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
On 17 April 2010 21:36, Michael Milesmmamiga6@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/17/2010 01:22 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
On 17 April 2010 20:09, Michael Milesmmamiga6@gmail.com wrote:
Had an interesting error pop up after I ran Avira on this computer
gvfs-metadata segment fault 11
I would assume it was Avira that produced this fault
I ran this command rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata
I will test and see if it repaired it.
Please get a blog. Your noise goes out to thousands of people and it really isn't as interesting as you seem to think.
You know, if have nothing nice to say then please don't say anything I found your comment very rude sir
That was deliberate. I find your mail etiquette very rude as well. The difference is that I was being rude to you personally to make my point. You are being rude to every subscriber to this list. I would suggest that as you seem to have very little sensible to say, that you follow your own advise Sir.
You need to consider that this list is a broadcast medium. We have no choice about which posts make it to our mailboxes, everything you send, whether relevant or interesting makes it to all of our inboxes. It would be more efficient if you filtered yourself at source than we all independently filter you at the time of reception, but I'm quite willing to do the latter if you like - but then you won't get the benefit of my help, which you've found useful at least once.
I reviewed your contribution to this list over the past four weeks which you have been posting and found lots of examples of bad behaviour. As an example, when in one post about what kind of GPU Gene should buy, Andrew Haley asked you why you felt you needed CUDA support, you couldn't answer. Then you came back later and started a new post (new thread) with the following:
=========== I just googled cuda applications fedora 12 and it seems there applications sprouting up now.
Another year and linux should catch up, I hope it is not that long
It sure is one to follow as GPU computing is a cheap way to increase performance on your machines ===========
The point being, if I or anyone else wanted to know this information or perhaps wanted to form an educated opinion, we are just as (if not more) capable of trawling search engines than you are. This apparently wasn't enough for you - you felt the need to inform us that ATI were also developing something like CUDA - again, you felt the need to broadcast this information using the following new post (I've reproduced it in it's entirety):
=========== Ati has put out CAL which is Cuda for ATI machines. Same thing, more software needs support but will come to light. ===========
In summary - your mailing list behaviour is rude and annoying. I'm glad I got your attention, so perhaps you can take this as a piece of advise:
It's better to stay silent and look a fool, rather than post and remove all doubt. (to paraphrase Mark Twain)
-- Sam
I am glad you are keeping track
I do know that guide lines about behaviour are clearly outlined in the fedora mailing list guidelines
Be nice to people is one of them.
I do remember the question about cuda when I was asked why and I believe I answered that by discussing the GPU being used as a general OS processor other than just display. Boinc and Seti@home project does just that Soon to be used by video conversion utilities (I hope) in linux kind of like it is being used in the windows environment now
Sorry if I offended you with rant, but you know I have seen quite a bit of rant on this board
So maybe do like I do and when you see a email that does not appeal to you then just press delete
Have a great day
Michael